docs/depolarization/depolarization.rst

changeset 117
e648de2b917e
parent 111
34d0acd7ef4f
child 125
003aa42747f5
equal deleted inserted replaced
116:5f36c691670e 117:e648de2b917e
137 Please note once again that the polarization channels are described in terms of transmitted and reflected signals. This means that according to different lidar instrumental configurations, the transmitted or the reflected channel can contain total, perpendicular or parallel polarized signals. 137 Please note once again that the polarization channels are described in terms of transmitted and reflected signals. This means that according to different lidar instrumental configurations, the transmitted or the reflected channel can contain total, perpendicular or parallel polarized signals.
138 138
139 In order to retrieve the backscatter profile the total signal must be obtained combining the transmitted and reflected polarized signals. The following formula is used: 139 In order to retrieve the backscatter profile the total signal must be obtained combining the transmitted and reflected polarized signals. The following formula is used:
140 140
141 .. math:: 141 .. math::
142 I_{total} \propto \frac{\eta^*}{K}H_R I_T - H_T I_R 142 I_{total} \propto \frac{\frac{\eta^*}{K}H_R I_T - H_T I_R}{H_R G_T - H_T G_R}
143 143
144 The formulas above are general and can be adapted to all possible polarization lidar configurations selecting the right polarization cross-talk correction parameters (see Table 1.1). 144 The formulas above are general and can be adapted to all possible polarization lidar configurations selecting the right polarization cross-talk correction parameters (see Table 1.1).
145 145
146 Let's suppose, for example, we have the perpendicular polarized lidar signal on the transmitted channel and the parallel polarized on reflected channel. For an ideal system (no diattenuation and cross-talk) we have: 146 Let's suppose, for example, we have the perpendicular polarized lidar signal on the transmitted channel and the parallel polarized on reflected channel. For an ideal system (no diattenuation and cross-talk) we have:
147 147

mercurial