| |
1 Frequently asked questions |
| |
2 ========================== |
| |
3 |
| |
4 Is it necessary to provide only measurment periods with cloud free conditions and |
| |
5 homogeneous atmosphere or is this part of ELDA or the pre processing of the data? |
| |
6 For example in cases with scattered low cumulus clouds. |
| |
7 |
| |
8 At moment you should provide cloud free data because the automatic cloud screening |
| |
9 is not yet implemented in the SCC. We are working on this issue and hopefully the new |
| |
10 module will be implemented at the end of ACTRIS project . |
| |
11 |
| |
12 What is the definition of low range, ultra near range and high range channels? |
| |
13 Are there any threshold values? |
| |
14 |
| |
15 There are no threshold values defined for the different range types. This information |
| |
16 is used only in the gluing procedures just to identify which channel should be taken |
| |
17 as low range and which one as far range. If no gluing is applied by the SCC the range |
| |
18 id flags are not taken into account. |
| |
19 |
| |
20 Due to changes in the settings of our lidarsystem, the depolarization factor can |
| |
21 change during the measurement. Is it necessary to provide one SCC-file for each settings |
| |
22 or is it possible to set the Depolarization_Factor variable time dependent? |
| |
23 |
| |
24 Unfortunately it is not possible to have time dependence on Depolarization_Factor variable. |
| |
25 So if this parameter changes you should provide different SCC files for each setting. |
| |
26 |
| |
27 Is it possible for documentation purposes to put own parameters in the SCC-NetCDF file? |
| |
28 For example who created the file.... Are there any reasons against this? |
| |
29 |
| |
30 Technically as long as you use not standard SCC variables for your own parameters there are |
| |
31 no problems for the SCC. It will just ignore these not standard variables. |
| |
32 |
| |
33 Which NetCDF version is to use? NetCDF3, NetCDF3 Classic, NetCDF4, NetCDF4 Classic? |
| |
34 |
| |
35 The NetCDF libraries 4.1.3 are used in all the SCC modules. So all the NetCDF formats you |
| |
36 have indicated should be compatible with the SCC (we have tested NetCDF3 and NetCDF4). |
| |
37 |
| |
38 What are the values for the lidar ratio used in the SCC_DB? |
| |
39 |
| |
40 The values of (fixed) lidar ratio used by the SCC in the elastic retrieval can be set by |
| |
41 the user using the SCC web interface. In particular you can define a lidar ratio value for |
| |
42 each elastic backscatter product: in the product page there is the section “Elastic Backscatter |
| |
43 options” in which there is the field “Fixed lr”. In case you want to use a lidar ratio profile |
| |
44 you should set LR_Input accordingly and provide an external LR profile NetCDF file |
| |
45 (see documentation on SCC file format). |
| |
46 |
| |
47 In cases of measurements where Raman channels are available, the SCC will calculate the Raman |
| |
48 backscatter profile. If I want to retrieve Klett-retrievals for this channel, too (e.g 532nm) |
| |
49 is it sufficient to set the value in LR_input(channels) to 1 or 0 plus a LR-profile to get |
| |
50 both retrievals? |
| |
51 |
| |
52 No. In general, for each lidar configuration you can define a set of optical products to be calculated |
| |
53 for that configuration using the SCC web interface. So suppose you have a system with 532nm and 607nm |
| |
54 channels. In this case you have 2 options: |
| |
55 #. Raman backscatter and extinction in the e532 file and Raman backscatter (full resolution) in the b532 |
| |
56 file. In this case you should associate to the configuration a product of type “lidar ratio and will |
| |
57 produce the e532 file and a product of type “Raman backscatter” which will produce the b532 file |
| |
58 #. Raman backscatter and extinction in the e532 file and elastic backscatter in the b532 file. |
| |
59 In this case you should associate to the configuration a product of type “lidar ratio and extinction” |
| |
60 which will produce the e532 file and a product of type “elastic backscatter” which will produce the b532 file |
| |
61 |
| |
62 Note: you cannot calculate a b532 file containing the Raman and elastic backscatters at the same time. |
| |
63 The reason is that the 2 products will produce an output file with the same name (according to the EARLINET rules). |
| |
64 Moreover in general, it makes no sense to calculate the elastic backscatter when you can calculate the Raman |
| |
65 one which usually is better. |
| |
66 |
| |
67 What are the conventions for the filnames for the various files that need to be uploaded? |
| |
68 |
| |
69 The following definitions apply: |
| |
70 - SCC raw lidar data file |
| |
71 |
| |
72 This file should be named as measID.nc. For example if your measurement had a measurementID of 20130101cc00 the corresponding NetCDF file should be named 20130101cc00.nc |
| |
73 |
| |
74 - Sounding file |
| |
75 |
| |
76 The file should be named as rs_measID.nc. Considering the above example the sounding file should be named rs_20130101cc00.nc |
| |
77 |
| |
78 In this case you should also set the global attribute Sounding_File_Name in the raw lidar data file as: |
| |
79 |
| |
80 Sounding_File_Name=rs_20130101cc00.nc |
| |
81 |
| |
82 - Lidarration file |
| |
83 |
| |
84 The file should be named as lr_measID.nc. Considering the above example the sounding file should be named lr_20130101cc00.nc |
| |
85 |
| |
86 In this case you should also set the global attribute LR_File_Name in the raw lidar data file as: |
| |
87 |
| |
88 LR_File_Name=lr_20130101cc00.nc |
| |
89 |
| |
90 - Overlap file |
| |
91 |
| |
92 The file should be named as ov_measID.nc. Considering the above example the sounding file should be named ov_20130101cc00.nc |
| |
93 |
| |
94 In this case you should also set the global attribute Overlap_File_Name in the raw lidar data file as: |
| |
95 |
| |
96 Overalp_File_Name=ov_20130101cc00.nc |
| |
97 |
| |
98 |
| |
99 |
| |
100 |